—————

## 📄 Full Transcript: _Explaining the Vertisan INNACON_

**Speaker:** James Vertisan
**Source:** [YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6g6BAsZKLs](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6g6BAsZKLs)

—

**James Vertisan:**
The other part that’s important when it comes to understanding **Fractal** and the **particle lattice** is what’s called the **INNACON**.

It just looks like a little square.

See these connection points?
There are **12 hexagons** and **6 squares** — those **zons** attach there.
They attach **on the squares**.

I’ll cover that in a little more detail.

—

What does the INNACON do?

You can think of it kind of like a **bridge over a bay**,
but at the same time, like a **firewall** — it has rules and restrictions.

It allows **information to flow** in different directions —
but not consistently.

– Information might be **valid this way**, but **not valid that way**.

– You might be allowed to **pass one way**, but **not go back**.

– You may go through it and realize:
_“Oh, I can’t turn around — it was a one-way street.”_

There’s a **lot** happening inside the INNACON.

—

Now, the **name** is kind of funny.

If you look in the dictionary:

– An **antecedent** is what came before,

– A **postcedent** is what comes after.

So, for example:

– Your **parents** would be antecedents,

– Your **children** would be postcedents.

But the thing about **Fractal**, and this little guy —
is that it’s **not just antecedent or postcedent**.

It’s actually functioning in **six different directions**,
and technically a **seventh one** — **time**.

And there’s no word in English that defines that.

So I thought:

> “I’m kind of stuck. I need a name for a _cedent connector_ — because that’s what it does. It connects one particle to the next, to the next, to the next.”

And that’s how I came up with the name:

> **INNACON** — _“I Need A Cedent COnnector Name.”_

—

So yeah, that’s where the name **INNACON** came from.

It connects **one particle to the next to the next**,
but not always in predictable ways.

—

**Audience Member:**
I have a question.

You said the INNACON connects differently, like a one-way street — sometimes you can go back, sometimes you can’t.

So… is every connection different?

—

**James Vertisan:**
Exactly.

Let me show you a simple example.

If you look at it from **this angle**, you see **one color**.
But if you look at it from another angle, you see something **completely different**.

So depending on which **direction** you’re going —
the **rules change**.

You see something **differently**, and what’s **allowed** also changes.

—

This **prism** here is a really good example.

When light shines from **this direction**, you see **these colors**.
From **here**, it’s completely different.
From **there**, it’s different again.

It’s just to help **visualize** the idea that:

> When you look at the INNACON from different directions, you see different things — and **different rules are allowed**.

—

That’s what the **INNACON** does.

– It **protects access** to the particles.

– It also **provides a route** to get to a particle.

And all of that has to do with **graph theory** —
how things are **connected**, and what **paths are valid** based on where you are and where you’re going.